Email me

July 27, 2006

Uh Oh

Could Floyd Landis become bike racing's Ben Johnson? Top of the world one day and the sport's signature goat the next? I certainly hope not, but reports are that Landis has failed blood tests. The tests showed unusually high testosterone levels on the day he made his miraculous ride.

Bad news. They're going to run tests on his B sample to verify. Let's hope the first results were wrong.

Comments
 
(1) by acchalfbreed (unregistered) on 07/28/2006 05:10 pm
Landis has had a second chance to respond to these alligations, but curiously, he isn't challenging the test results, but what the tests mean. That is, he offers that whatever results the test measure, the content is all natural, and he's NOT appologetic. Makes me wonder, IF the results are high, will the ruling bodies give him time or offer a way to see if these results can be duplicated naturally? Or are they under the gun to prove that the recent 'doping' storm that has arrived in cycling is being dealt with by sacrificing the new 'king' of the Tour?

Will wait to see...

 
(2) by Dave on 07/29/2006 10:46 am
acchalfbreed wrote:
Landis has had a second chance to respond to these alligations, but curiously, he isn't challenging the test results, but what the tests mean. That is, he offers that whatever results the test measure, the content is all natural, and he's NOT appologetic. Makes me wonder, IF the results are high, will the ruling bodies give him time or offer a way to see if these results can be duplicated naturally? Or are they under the gun to prove that the recent 'doping' storm that has arrived in cycling is being dealt with by sacrificing the new 'king' of the Tour?

Will wait to see...


I don't claim to know all about the various testing rules, but I do know that officially the results mean nothing until the B sample is tested in the presence of Landis (or his representatives). I think I heard him say that he expected those results to come back the same, which supports his claim that it's a natural increase. Unfortunately for him, from what I've read, alcohol can't raise your ratio the amount necessary to explain his ratio.

Evidently there is also a test that can distinguish between natural testosterone and synthetic. If he used a patch, which is the inference, I assume that this test could tell the difference. Given the importance of this result, it would be crazy not to run this test. If it shows that he did not take synthetic testosterone, it might point out that the initial test is critically flawed (it has been challenged in the past). Or maybe that there's a new doping method/drug out there.

Comment:
Username or your name/handle: 

   
Posted by Dave at July 27, 2006 11:24 AM | TrackBack

BrightCar Car Maintenance Software  - Software To Manage Your Car Maintenance Schedule
Basketball Scores
Links
Columnists
Caulton Tudor
Ned Barnett
Lenox Rawlings
Tony Kornheiser
Michael Wilbon
Bill Simmons
Blogs
ACC BasketBlog
The Sports Frog
Duke Basketball Report
FanBlogs (college football)
Yoco: College Basketball
StateFans Nation
Carolina Hoops Experience
Carolina Basketball Update
Ken Pomeroy
The SportsProf
Chris's Sports Blog
ACC Info
Charlie Board's ACC Stats Page
Official ACC Site
Ratings
Mike Greenfield's Ratings
Pomeroy Ratings
Sagarin Ratings