Email me

September 07, 2006

ACC Roundup

A few thoughts about last weekend's abysmal start to the ACC football season ...

Virginia Tech and Clemson both pretty much did what they needed to do. Good teams win games like those easily and both did. You can't learn too many positives from cupcake games, but you can learn negatives. No obvious negatives were exposed, so that's good.

Boston College might be a bit concerned that their game was so close, but you should never underestimate MAC teams, especially playing in their stadium. In many ways, that was the biggest game ever for Central Michigan. The Eagles should be content with that win.

Maryland looked like they were headed for a laugher at half-time, up 28-7 over William & Mary. Then they were beat 7-3 in the second half. Now maybe Friedgen intentionally shut things down, but I tend to think that scoring 3 points in a half against a dejected and overmatched 1-AA opponent is a warning flag.

Georgia Tech had a rare good loss last weekend. Sure, they would have much rather have beaten #2 Notre Dame, and you could argue that they deserved to win, but they looked good in defeat. If the Yellow Jackets can maintain that level against their whole schedule (and they probably can't), then they could have a very good season. Or maybe the Domers are just grossly overrated. It happens.

Florida State and Miami played a near repeat of last year's defensive snoozer. The 'Noles got the critical win, but they have to be concerned about their offense. Both teams should be concerned. Yes, the defenses were incredible, but that was partly because both O-lines sucked. Also, neither team has the number of playmakers on offense that they used to have. Think about it - who was the last good player that FSU sent to the NFL? Laverneandshirley Coles?

And can they stop playing that game on opening weekend? It's just a travesty and a very public reminder of Bobby Bowden's cowardice. He begged to get that game early so that if they lost it wouldn't hurt their chances at a national title. That's just sad. Who wouldn't rather see those teams late in the year when the game means more and both teams are better prepared?

North Carolina was supposed to be better this year. So was Rutgers. Guess who was right? Someone has to be bad in college football, so if teams like Rutgers and Navy step up, someone has to step down. Tag! UNC, you're it!

BTW, what was up with John Bunting never putting Cam Sexton in the game? He said he'd get both QBs in the game, but yet stuck with Joe Dailey the whole way despite losing for most of the game. Sure, Dailey's numbers were pretty decent, but he made two critical mistakes and wasn't leading the offense to points. You have to wonder how a decision (or mistake, depending on how it happened that Sexton never got in) will affect the team. Will they still trust Bunting?

Virgina got thumped up at Pittsburgh and it's very likely that it was the first of many Cavalier beatings. The Panthers might actually be good - they were supposed to be last year - but then, they are coached by Dave Wannstedt. One of the first rules of football is that you should never lose games to teams coached by Dave Wannstedt. It's gonna be a long season for Al Groh. Well, unless the ACC is as bad as it's looked so far.

NC State got a solid win against App State. No win over the Mountaineers should be discounted, but the Wolfpack should be very concerned about their passing game. It sucked last year and Marcus Stone threw for a whopping 36 yards on Saturday night. 36 yards. That's a decent screen play.

Wake Forest had a nice win over Syracuse, but most people are talking about the broken arm of quarterback Benjamin Mauk. That's bad luck for the Deacs (and Mauk), but lets not forget that Mauk has been much more hype than performance in his career. Jim Grobe's game is a power running game, so if they can get that rolling, they'll be OK.

By the way, did you notice that Wake beat a BCS opponent, one with a very solid football program, and still failed to cover the spread? Has that ever happened before? Wake was favored by something like 15 points! That right there should have been enough evidence to fire Syracuse coach Greg Robinson on the spot. Once that line came out - boom! - fired.

The evidence:

  • The ACC added Florida State in 1992, improving the strength of the football league.

  • The ACC added Miami and Virginia Tech in 2004 and then Boston College in 2005, again improving the strength of the football league.

  • With those new teams and increased spending and efforts at nearly every other school, the ACC is clearly stronger than it's ever been in football.

  • Richmond is a 1-AA school.

  • Duke was playing at home.

  • Duke lost.

  • Duke was shutout 13-0.

  • Again, Duke was shutout by a 1-AA school.


The conclusion:
Duke's loss to Richmond was the worst loss in ACC football history.

Comments
 
(1) by Martin (unregistered) on 09/07/2006 01:30 pm
I know it's a damn shame, but it's not like being the #1 team in the country and losing to Chaminade.

 
(2) by Dave on 09/07/2006 05:22 pm
Martin wrote:
I know it's a damn shame, but it's not like being the #1 team in the country and losing to Chaminade.


Touche

 
(3) by wolfpacker4ever (unregistered) on 09/07/2006 05:35 pm
Me thinks you are concerned about something that NCSU did not try to do like they tried to pass and failed. Check out what this guy has to say about game one results and management in his last paragraph. The bottom line was smart offensive coordinators like the guy at USC keep it simple and horizontal in the passing game in game one.

Monday Morning Quarterback

By Matt Zemek
CollegeFootballNews.com
Posted Sep 5, 2006

 
(4) by Dave on 09/07/2006 08:07 pm
It's no secret that few teams open up much of their playbook in week 1, particularly in a game they expect to win relatively easily, but no OC expects his QB to throw for only 36 yards. As Zemek wrote in that article, "coordinators need to put their QBs in situations where they can be effective and ball-secure at the same time." 36 yards passing isn't effective. Also he and you used USC as an example. USC QBs threw for 280 yards and 3 TDs while piling up 50 points on an SEC defense.

It's early and I'm not saying that State or Stone is going to suck, but it was a poor start.

 
(5) by Bob (unregistered) on 09/07/2006 10:59 pm
This is offtopic, but if you guys dislike the new rules that shorten the game, here's an online petition:


http://www.wehatethenewclockrules.com/process_signup.php

Feel free to pass it on.

 
(6) by Marcus (unregistered) on 09/08/2006 10:33 pm
C'mon Dave...Bobby Bowden NEVER "begged" to get the Miami game moved up to week 1, let alone to make it "easier" for him to win a title if he lost. That's just ridiculous, as well as saying that's a sign of his "cowardice". If you don't like the man, fine, but don't lie to prove your point. Bowden has publically stated he wants the Miami game back in it's usual early October slot.

 
(7) by Dave on 09/08/2006 10:40 pm
Marcus wrote:
C'mon Dave...Bobby Bowden NEVER "begged" to get the Miami game moved up to week 1, let alone to make it "easier" for him to win a title if he lost. That's just ridiculous, as well as saying that's a sign of his "cowardice". If you don't like the man, fine, but don't lie to prove your point. Bowden has publically stated he wants the Miami game back in it's usual early October slot.


I may have exaggerated a bit to make the point, but he most certainly did whinge quite a bit about Miami joining the league. He made several comments (and I'm too tired now to try to find them. Maybe this weekend) about keeping the game early in the year. He also questioned having the league championship game, because obviously that would risk having FSU play Miami at the end of the year.

The old ACC setup was very good for Florida State. They were nearly guaranteed a BCS bid and if they won their non-conference matchups (or lost one early) they'd have a good shot at a national championship.

And I don't dislike Bobby Bowden. I just find him eminently mockable.

 
(8) by Marcus (unregistered) on 09/08/2006 10:59 pm
Dave,

FSU AD Dave Hart was the driving force in getting Miami into the ACC, along with VT. His 3rd choice was Syracuse, which thankfully didn't pan out. Bobby knew full well what that meant in regards to a championship game. What he questioned was having Miami in the opposite division. Anyway, if you have any idea of the workings of the FSU Athletic Dept (I do), you have to know that Bobby Bowden apporved of this as well. Bowden is notorious for being self-deprecating (esp. in regard to playing tough teams), but "cowardice" in regards to scheduling just doesn't fit. He could have dropped Miami 20 years ago (like Florida did), but didn't. He signed off on a 1-shot deal with Michigan in '91 (one game at Ann Arbor, no return trip). He signed off playing Notre Dame on a home-and-Orlando basis (for '93, '94). He lobbied to get into the SEC every year from '76-'90, and played the good soldier when we joined the ACC in '91.

Yes, Bobby is mockable with the dad-gums galore, but he's neither a coward when it comes to scheduling, nor did he want the Miami game on Labor Day. Traditionally, FSU's played Miami in early October (with several exceptions). Bobby's greatest fault is that he finds it necessary to emplot his 40-something idiot son as offensive coordinator.

 
(9) by Dave on 09/09/2006 08:04 pm
OK, I'll concede that "cowardice" was a bit strong. It's just frustrating to me to see those teams clash so early and so ugly. And I think the ACC -with pressure from both athletic departments - put them together early so that the loss wouldn't hurt so much in the end-of-year polls.

Yes, I remember clearly the role of AD Hart and even the president (whose name I can't recall - Wetherell?). I was particularly unimpressed with the things that came out of the president's mouth and typewriter (remember his infamous memo with the spelling and grammatical errors?). While I like Bowden, I can't say the same for those other guys.

 
(10) by ChuckChuck.us (unregistered) on 09/17/2006 11:52 am
Had the Wolfpack lost to Appalachian St. in week 1, and they could have, that game would have been right in contention with the Duke loss.

Chuck Amato is more of an embarrassment to the ACC than Duke football. At least with Duke, there is always the argument that "they are a basketball school."

ChuckChuck.us

Lets, at long last, Chuck Chuck!!!

Comment:
Username or your name/handle: 

   
Posted by Dave at September 7, 2006 10:23 AM | TrackBack

BrightCar Car Maintenance Software  - Software To Manage Your Car Maintenance Schedule
Basketball Scores
Links
Columnists
Caulton Tudor
Ned Barnett
Lenox Rawlings
Tony Kornheiser
Michael Wilbon
Bill Simmons
Blogs
ACC BasketBlog
The Sports Frog
Duke Basketball Report
FanBlogs (college football)
Yoco: College Basketball
StateFans Nation
Carolina Hoops Experience
Carolina Basketball Update
Ken Pomeroy
The SportsProf
Chris's Sports Blog
ACC Info
Charlie Board's ACC Stats Page
Official ACC Site
Ratings
Mike Greenfield's Ratings
Pomeroy Ratings
Sagarin Ratings