Email me

March 22, 2007

McLeaving

Earlier today I was thinking about one of the articles I want to write after the season is over. I was thinking about Duke's team next year, with everyone returning and three McDonald's All-Americans coming in. Josh McRoberts didn't live up to preseason expectations, but if you ignore his high school accolades, he still has a pretty promising future as a college player. With another year of practice and maturity to go with his current skills and athletic ability, he could still develop into an All-American-caliber player.

Little did I suspect that just an hour later I'd hear that McRoberts has decided to go pro. Wow. This isn't nearly as surprising as Shavlik Randolph leaving early, but it did catch me off guard. I thought he might leave last year, but after this season? Could any NBA team really be salivating over this guy? He couldn't dominate in college and showed all kinds of red flags - an unwillingness to bang, a tendency to shy away from big shots, a fragile ego, a generally poor grasp of how to use his talents. All of those weaknesses are correctable, but the NBA is a damn difficult place to learn. This isn't exactly a Will Avery situation - 6'3" guards are a dime-a-dozen so if you can't play right away, you'll get cut - but it's just really hard to imagine that he can succeed at the next level. Sure, he'll make a team and stay in the league for at least a few years - if Randolph can do it, McRoberts can - but anything more than that is going to require a complete attitude readjustment.

On the flip side, I'm pretty sure this is a good thing for Duke. Clearly this year's team had some problems with chemistry. They didn't play often as a cohesive unit and were generally less than the sum of their parts. When that's the case, losing your "best" player is often the best thing that can happen. Instead of everyone waiting around for McRoberts to grow a pair and become a leader, they can rally around each other and let Paulus step up as the unquestioned captain (although I'm sure DeMarcus Nelson will be co-captain). Duke still has a lot of young, developing talent and has more on the way. If their jersey said something like "Clemson" or "Virginia" on the front instead of "Duke," they'd have everyone optimistically looking toward next year and wondering how a school like that acquired so many players.

Don't be surprised when the rumors start leaking out that Krzyzewski pushed McRoberts out the door. Maybe K has heard of the Ewing Theory.

Comments
 
(1) by william on 03/22/2007 06:45 pm
I thought that I told you a couple of weeks ago that he was gone, lol. Feinstein's Wash Post article was probably commissioned from close to the top.

 
(2) by william on 03/22/2007 06:52 pm
Tiffani Amber-Thiessen over Shannen Doherty and 90210 continued to thrive long after Melrose had lost its edge.

My father and I were talking about Ewing in the pro's and he thought that Ewing originally was going to have success like Bill Russell in the pro's but nobody knew then that Ewing would end up playing 20 feet away from the basket on offense. Olajuwon played more like a traditional center and had more success. (Maybe now the NBA has caught up with Ewing with Nowitzi and people like that, although I believe that NBA players have now become so proficient at the 3-pointer, which once seemed such a difficult shot, as to ruin the look and feel of the game.)

 
(3) by Dave on 03/22/2007 07:59 pm
Yeah, Ewing developed a beautiful jump shot, which was pretty surprising considering how raw he was as a college freshman. He was a devastating defender, but didn't do much on offense outside of about three feet.

He also lost a lot of his quickness after he went to the NBA. Bad knees.

 
(4) by RexKramer (unregistered) on 03/22/2007 10:48 pm
Lest we forget, Patrick Ewing probably has an NBA title to his name if (1) Charles Smith hits one of the 7 layup attempts he had in the final seconds of Game 5 of the '93 Eastern final (Eff you, Charles. Eff You.), or (2) Starks' 3 pointer at the end of Game 6 of the '94 final somehow goes in. He had a great career, he just played at a time when the NBA was loaded with great players and great competitors.

 
(5) by BJD95 (unregistered) on 03/23/2007 01:17 am
Duke people have been telling me this for weeks. I didn't get it, either. Several of them wanted him to leave. they didn't like him much more than other ACC fans did.

McBob, McFloperts, The Great White Hype.

 
(6) by Deacon (unregistered) on 03/23/2007 08:05 am
This makes sense to me. McRoberts was looking at 2 more years of criticism for the way he fit into Coach K's system OR 2 years towards his development as a Euro big man the NBA. True, he's not European but he sure plays like one. And I'll welcome the break from the talking heads going on about his stat line. Ya know, I'm all for a forward having great assists, steals, etc but get me my 8+ boards and 16 points at the block before you start filling the stat sheet.

 
(7) by username (unregistered) on 03/23/2007 10:37 am
Clearly, McRoberts didn't live up to his potential and was soft mentally. BUT...I don't buy the argument that Duke will suddenly be a better team now that they've lost their best passer, best rebounder, and only post defender. If they don't land Patrick Patterson, they'll get out-rebounded by 10 per game. I hope Singler is looking forward to playing center for a couple years before bolting for the NBA.

 
(8) by tieguy on 03/23/2007 11:55 am
No particularly good reason for Josh to stay around- he wants to be an NBA 3 or 4, and K will never give him that training. Much better to get drafted (he'll be a first rounder on potential alone) and at least attempt to learn in the NBA. Duke folks have been whispering about this since the end of last season, really- so it isn't a surprise.

Unless he was the source of all of Duke's chemistry problems, this is subtraction by subtraction- our best passer, our best rebounder, our only post defender, and one of our best scorers (even if he didn't live up to expectations.) Maybe he wasn't great, but he was very good, and unlike recent Duke teams this team has a distinct shortage of very good.

 
(9) by Roy (unregistered) on 03/23/2007 06:34 pm
I think the loss of McRoberts IS going to improve Duke's team next year. Coach K probably didn't cry about McBob leaving early like he has in the past.
With McRoberts gone, Duke is going to put a smaller lineup out on the court made up entirely of shooters. It kind of reminds me of Duke w/o Boozer in 2002, where the team actually played better spreading the court and shooting threes. I think that kind of Duke team is the scariest to play against.

 
(10) by DMoore on 03/26/2007 05:21 pm
I can't see this as good for Duke. Duke's biggest problem was not that McRoberts didn't meet expectations, but that they don't have great shooters like they have in the past. If they'd had the shooters to spread the floor, McRoberts would have looked a lot better, as both his assist totals and scoring would have gone up. K's offense is more 3 point oriented than folks realize. Weak ball handling and an inability to stop quick guards lost them many of their big games this season too.

Comment:
Username or your name/handle: 

   
Posted by Dave at March 22, 2007 04:36 PM | TrackBack

BrightCar Car Maintenance Software  - Software To Manage Your Car Maintenance Schedule
Basketball Scores
Links
Columnists
Caulton Tudor
Ned Barnett
Lenox Rawlings
Tony Kornheiser
Michael Wilbon
Bill Simmons
Blogs
ACC BasketBlog
The Sports Frog
Duke Basketball Report
FanBlogs (college football)
Yoco: College Basketball
StateFans Nation
Carolina Hoops Experience
Carolina Basketball Update
Ken Pomeroy
The SportsProf
Chris's Sports Blog
ACC Info
Charlie Board's ACC Stats Page
Official ACC Site
Ratings
Mike Greenfield's Ratings
Pomeroy Ratings
Sagarin Ratings