April 02, 2007
The Duke Hatred Report
Everybody loves an enemy. You can't have an "us" without a "them." There's no greater uniter than a common adversary.
And boy do people love to hate Duke. It's pretty fascinating really, to see just how far this national obsession with the Blue Devils has gone. There have been a lot of hated teams in my lifetime - the New York Yankees, the Dallas Cowboys, Notre Dame football, North Carolina basketball, the Cobra Kai - but nobody has seen a backlash quite like Duke.
The Duke Basketball Report has a long article today taking a look at the phenomenon. It's an interesting read, but I get the feeling that they never quite nailed the reasons why they are hated. I think it's hard to be that close and still see what's happening. It's like trying to describe the Empire State Building while standing at it's base.
To me, the hatred boils down to a few key points:
1. Duke wins, a lot, and has won for a long time . After a while, Americans tire of a winner.
2. Duke is everywhere. This is an offshoot of the first point, but it's important enough to stand on its own. Nobody hates the Carolina women's soccer team. Duke is on TV all the time and even when they aren't, Dick Vitale and the other announcers talk about them. This has been going on for nearly two decades now.
3. Duke University is an elite school filled with largely rich kids. The kids who go to Duke are the ones you hated in high school - the ones smarter and richer than you. Then you see those kids on TV chanting and jumping and getting credit for being so much more clever than other schools' fans.
4. Duke has had a lot of very good white players. I can't explain why, but nobody pisses off opposing fans quite like a good white player, and Duke has had quite a few very good (OK, and some not-so-good) ones - Christian Laettner, Bobby Hurley, JJ Redick, Steve Wojciechowski, Chris Collins, Josh McRoberts, etc.
5. Mike Krzyzewski isn't exactly the most lovable guy in the world. He screams at refs, his voice is whiny, he rarely talks to local reporters and he makes TV commercials about what a great guy he is. It's like he wants folks to hate him. Seriously, I think he probably does want this.
Add it all up and you have a perfect storm of virulence.
I do want to add that I don't think there was much of any sort of pro-Duke officiating bias this season. That may have something to do with Duke's skill level; who knows?
What the writer fails to mention is that when you ballyhoo and hype every single McDonald's all-American including the undeserving ones like Paulus and McRoberts, it grates on REAL basketball fans.
Now if Duke fans have their panties in a bunch because they are hated, I recommend they polish their titles because those can't be taken away, and most of us other ACC fans would love to have a title trophy.
As for the Nation of Islam "blog," that's ridiculous. I stumbled on that piece of crap last week and thought that someone's about to get sued. It's reading a bit into Coach K making "the Negro" do his bidding, but Henderson's not blameless here and he basically did what John Chaney had his guy do and, bada bing, someone got hurt pretty badly. It was a frustration foul and maybe Coach K didn't "call" for it to happen, but he reaps a LOT of benefit off of the fact that he's the face of the program AND his kids "graduate" and they have names we can pronounce and every player grew up on a cul-de-sac and they don't taunt or whatever crap that Duke is peddling to Madison Avenue this week. What Henderson did was damage the image of the program. Coach K is responsible for that. Either the kid did what he did on orders and needs to be suspended for more than one game OR kicked off the team.
As a Virginia grad, I'd just be happy if Coach K would stop running up the score on teams by leaving starters in when games are essentially over. I'm not the first person to bring it up, but ACC coaches have gotten tired of it over the years, especially the programs looking to step up a wee bit. Because we all know if a team preens after dunks against Duke or "runs" up the score, Coach K gets all uppity and wants to street brawl except you aren't allowed to throw a punch back when you get cheap-shotted by one of his little Cosby kids.
If you don't believe me, look up an ACC tourney game back in the 1980's with Sampson. Coach K is STILL bitching about how Virginia "ran the score up by keeping Sampson in." Let the record show that Sampson was in foul trouble all day and played 22 minutes of a 40 minute game and Duke still got blown out. Then segue to a game when Pete Gillen was the coach and in a 40 point Duke victory at Cameron, he took out Elton Brand and William Avery only to allow Jay Heaps, a soccer player, to jack up three-point shots in the games waning moments. No cheap-shot from a Virginia player to retaliate. Then, you have the Dahntay Jones "push-up" game. Now, let me say that he got a spectacular dunk on a facial on a Virginia player, but then he did PUSH-UPS after the fact as a taunt. The game officials did not whistle for a technical. Nobody from Virginia cheap-shotted Jones or any other Dukie for showing them up. And it happened on Virginia's home floor. And Coach K claims that Pete Gillen was a friend of his? What kind of coaching "leader" allows his players to do such a thing, and to a "friend," no less?
Sorry, gang, but Coach K used to be a decent guy. I liked Duke mildly when Grant Hill was there, but it's gotten ridiculous now. There's no true sportsmanship in that program, and I've seen it first hand. Besides, if Coach K was any type of sportsman, he'd at least have petitioned the league to give back that win against Virginia when there was a clock error and officiating error that cost Virginia the game. Or, they could have done right by Clemson in THEIR clock error game. Getting one win on a clock error is lucky. Two? That ain't a coinky-dinky folks. And Coach K knows that. No true sportsman wants to win games like that.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| It was a well-written article, typical pro-Duke fare, and they are entitled to rebut. |
I'll give it a try.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| What the writer fails to mention is that when you ballyhoo and hype every single McDonald's all-American including the undeserving ones like Paulus and McRoberts, it grates on REAL basketball fans. |
Hard to deny that some Duke players are overhyped. At the same time, it doesn't make any sense to hold it against the program. What would you have Coach K do, write in to ESPN and tell Vitale to stop talking about Duke? Tell AP sportwriters to vote against his players for awards? This argument's thrown against a lot of top teams (e.g. Yankees), and it doesn't make any more sense to me when applied to them than it does when applied to Duke. Sure, Jeter is overrated--but why should I hold that against him, he did nothing wrong. Same with Wojo (one consistent target of this tirade) and Paulus.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| As for the Nation of Islam "blog," that's ridiculous. I stumbled on that piece of crap last week and thought that someone's about to get sued. |
I think it's a parody, but yes, there are people out there who assert that K is racist because we have occasional good white players. I won't link to such sites though.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| It's reading a bit into Coach K making "the Negro" do his bidding, but Henderson's not blameless here and he basically did what John Chaney had his guy do and, bada bing, someone got hurt pretty badly. It was a frustration foul and maybe Coach K didn't "call" for it to happen, but he reaps a LOT of benefit off of the fact that he's the face of the program AND his kids "graduate" and they have names we can pronounce and every player grew up on a cul-de-sac and they don't taunt or whatever crap that Duke is peddling to Madison Avenue this week. What Henderson did was damage the image of the program. |
That is a totally groundless assertion that Coach K "basically did what John Chaney had his guy do." For one thing, Henderson was our best offensive weapon in the UNC game. Hansbrough did nothing to Henderson, and yet Coach K would order a retaliation, risking one of his best offensive players? He'd have to be completely insane to do that. If you were going to deliberately attack the man, you just plainly would not use Henderson. I thank you for allowing that "maybe" Coach K didn't order it, but frankly "it's obvious to anyone who considers the matter" that he didn't is more on target.
That said, I think you're right that it damaged the image of the program, but I doubt it affected the level of hatred--when a "news" organization is content to run a list of hated players, morph the K's face into a rats, etc., you know it's past all bounds of rationality
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| Coach K is responsible for that. Either the kid did what he did on orders and needs to be suspended for more than one game OR kicked off the team. |
The punishment is pretty much exactly on target with what similar incidents from other teams have gotten. Do you disagree with Roy Williams and Hansbrough himself about the foul?
(and I don't want to hear that Roy wouldn't tell the truth about this, he's an honest man and if he thought it was intentional, he would have said so or declined to answer the question).
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| As a Virginia grad, I'd just be happy if Coach K would stop running up the score on teams by leaving starters in when games are essentially over. I'm not the first person to bring it up, but ACC coaches have gotten tired of it over the years, especially the programs looking to step up a wee bit. Because we all know if a team preens after dunks against Duke or "runs" up the score, Coach K gets all uppity and wants to street brawl except you aren't allowed to throw a punch back when you get cheap-shotted by one of his little Cosby kids. |
I wish he pulled starters earlier too, but I think you're absolutely nuts if you think he runs it up as much as Roy Williams, who somehow never seems to attract much criticism for it.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| Then, you have the Dahntay Jones "push-up" game. Now, let me say that he got a spectacular dunk on a facial on a Virginia player, but then he did PUSH-UPS after the fact as a taunt. |
No defense for it. Just keep it in perspective is all Duke fans can ask.
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| Besides, if Coach K was any type of sportsman, he'd at least have petitioned the league to give back that win against Virginia |
Except that wouldn't make any sense--at best all you could ask is that he would ask that they go to the post-substitution situation. Why should he forfeit a game which was not over?
| dpc1994 wrote: |
| Or, they could have done right by Clemson in THEIR clock error game. |
Again, doing what? That game was tied, Duke had led most of the day. Don't know what you would have wanted him to do here.
For the "Duke gets all the calls" thing, I didn't list that as a cause, because I see that as an effect. Duke doesn't actually get more calls than any other team of their caliber. I've looked at plenty of analyses of this and none support the idea that Duke gets more calls. It just seems that way because they win all the damn time and so many people want them to lose that they remember those calls. Do you think we'll be hearing for years about how the refs took Arron Aflalo out of that game by giving him two fouls in the first two minutes? Or the same with Greg Oden in the first three minutes? Nope. The only mention of those situations I've read are about how those guys need to try to avoid fouls. If the opponent had been Duke, countless page-inches would have been filled about the refs trying to give Duke the game.
If you don't believe me, consider that just today in another message board I read a mention about how the refs screwed UConn in 2004 by calling two early fouls on Emeka Okafor. No matter that he didn't foul out, three Duke players did or that UConn actually won the game.
As for K running it up, well as a Virginia fan, I have to agree with you. The thing is, I don't think he always does it, but he seemed to really try to a make point in those early Gillen years when Virginia was REALLY bad and Duke had maybe their strongest teams. There was no question that K was running the score up a few times, subbing Brand and other starters back in when the score was WAY out of reach. But like I said, they don't always do that and really all top programs blow other teams out from time to time. Hell, Kansas beat Nebraska by something like 60 points earlier this year.
As for Henderson, I don't believe that K had anything to do with it. Things happen sometimes. Yes, it has probably affected Duke's standing with some people, but probably not that many. Like I said, Duke haters are legion already.
| Matt wrote: |
| Nice Karate Kid reference, Bill...er...I mean Dave. |
I almost pulled that line for that exact reason! I just couldn't think of a substitute.
| WCT wrote: |
| Nice post. However, I refuse to believe that the fact that Duke has a lot of white guys on the team contributes to the hatred. After all, most of the people who hate Duke are white. Plus, I have not heard of anyone who hates Tyler Handsborogh (spelling?) or Aaron Grey. I think it has more to do with the smugness of their coach, Their obnoxious fans (they chant "safety school" at other teams. Classy), and ESPN. And by ESPN, I of course mean Dick Vitale |
Oh, I think it's mostly white fans who hate white players. Not ALL white players of course. It's just that if you have a player who evokes some sort of reaction from opposing fans, it always seems stronger if that player is white.
Do you think this could be an issue of political correctness (to an extent)? I'm a white guy watching basketball and I see (e.g.) a black player chest-thumping and generally punking it up on court. If I say, "What a punk -- I don't like that guy," then someone invariably chimes in with, "You're just saying that because he's black (or, has cornrows, or tattoos, or whatever)." Whereas if I make the same statement about J.J. Redick chest-pumping and punking it up, it's OK because he's white.
I'm not disagreeing with your point (just the opposite, really) but I am just wondering if the entire situation is exacerbated by political correctness -- i.e., it's OK to hate white guys.
| Matt wrote: |
| Dave --
Do you think this could be an issue of political correctness (to an extent)? I'm a white guy watching basketball and I see (e.g.) a black player chest-thumping and generally punking it up on court. If I say, "What a punk -- I don't like that guy," then someone invariably chimes in with, "You're just saying that because he's black (or, has cornrows, or tattoos, or whatever)." Whereas if I make the same statement about J.J. Redick chest-pumping and punking it up, it's OK because he's white. I'm not disagreeing with your point (just the opposite, really) but I am just wondering if the entire situation is exacerbated by political correctness -- i.e., it's OK to hate white guys. |
You know, I really don't know. I'm not sure I want to try to guess, because then you get into tricky areas. I'll just leave it as an observation that I think most basketball fans would agree with.
Although I don't really think it's a political correctness thing (at least not entirely). It seems less conscious than that.
That's true. But the question is, why is Duke hated? And even though it doesn't make sense, overhyped players is nevertheless one of the reasons we hate Duke.
In fact, I think hype in general is the biggest factor. We all get tired of anyone, or anything, that gets too much hype, whether a sports team, movie, celebrity. After a while, the reaction is "Stop telling me how great it is!" and you just want to hate it because you're tired of hearing about it.
One other factor: I know some really, really obnoxious Duke fans. Obviously every school has its obnoxious fans, but the Duke obnoxiousness is different: it's smugness. These Duke fans assume the attitude that they are personally responsible for the team's success -- this especially goes for the alumni (who feel that as Cameron Crazies they were so clever). Obnoxious fans of other teams have some of that attitude, but I detect a different, more personalized, quality in the Duke fans I know. (And of course, I'm basing this on just a handful of Duke fans, so this may not be a generally applicable reason for hating Duke.)
| Gromit wrote: |
| Vick wrote: "Hard to deny that some Duke players are overhyped. At the same time, it doesn't make any sense to hold it against the program."
That's true. But the question is, why is Duke hated? And even though it doesn't make sense, overhyped players is nevertheless one of the reasons we hate Duke. In fact, I think hype in general is the biggest factor. We all get tired of anyone, or anything, that gets too much hype, whether a sports team, movie, celebrity. After a while, the reaction is "Stop telling me how great it is!" and you just want to hate it because you're tired of hearing about it. One other factor: I know some really, really obnoxious Duke fans. Obviously every school has its obnoxious fans, but the Duke obnoxiousness is different: it's smugness. These Duke fans assume the attitude that they are personally responsible for the team's success -- this especially goes for the alumni (who feel that as Cameron Crazies they were so clever). Obnoxious fans of other teams have some of that attitude, but I detect a different, more personalized, quality in the Duke fans I know. (And of course, I'm basing this on just a handful of Duke fans, so this may not be a generally applicable reason for hating Duke.) |
Yes, you're sort of summing up my points 2 and 3. I guess "obnoxious" is an offshoot of my third point, but it's related.
| WCT wrote: |
| Nice post. However, I refuse to believe that the fact that Duke has a lot of white guys on the team contributes to the hatred. After all, most of the people who hate Duke are white. Plus, I have not heard of anyone who hates Tyler Handsborogh (spelling?) or Aaron Grey. I think it has more to do with the smugness of their coach, Their obnoxious fans (they chant "safety school" at other teams. Classy), and ESPN. And by ESPN, I of course mean Dick Vitale |
Haven't heard of anyone who hates Tyler Hansbrough? Try the major NC State blog (StatesFans Nation). I'll pick out some quotes from the first five comments in their post on Henderson-Hansbrough:
1) The worst part of this is that Hansbrough now becomes a saint for displaying no class and getting what he deserved."
2) "Handsblow wanted to show up Dook, Henderson wanted to make sure the Traveller paid a price if he tried. I don’t think Henderson tried to deliberately smash poor little Tyler..."
3) "I’m glad Hanbrough got smashed"
4) "I definitely feel sorry for Henderson and not Hansbaby."
5) "Henderson would definitely not have done that had he known Hansbaby was going to bleed like Rocky, but, with Hansbaby trying to muscle in another basket, Henderson definitely threw every bit of force he had behind stopping Hansbaby cold—even if his intent went terribly awry."
6) "I sincerely hope Hansbaby goes pro this year, not because I fear his talent, but because I hate looking at the guy and all the crap he gets away with. It was pretty obvious down the stretch of the season that opposing players were getting tired of the golden boy and his antics too as Costner stood his ground, GT hacked the guy like mad, etc."
7) "It is a shame that a jackass like Hansborough takes a swing at a 40-minute warrior like Costner and all media dorks like Jimmy Dykes can talk about is Hansborough’s “will” and etc."
8 ) "Well, “Psycho T,” definitely had it coming to him, and I don’t feel one bit sorry for the guy."
These are the first five comments, folks, and there's some worse things down later on. And yeah, I do think he gets at least some of this crap because he's white (screaming a lot doesn't help--see Noah--and State fans have a legitimate grievance that Hansbrough swung at a State player and should have been ejected, but wasn't, but I think race factors in too)
And to be fair, I went to a hell of a lot of games from 2002-2006, and the only chants I ever heard about other schools were to the other Big Four schools, and it's not like they don't give us any for being "nerds," "dorks," and what have you, so I don't see how either is worse. You may appreciate this though: When Duke opened up the 05-06 season against Columbia, they had a group of about 5-8 fans who came down and as people filtered into the stadium, they did some yelling about their US News ranking (I think one over Duke's at the time).
| WCT wrote: |
| Ok Vick, if you pick UNC's blood rival, then obviously some fans are going to hate Handsborough. But my point is, there are plenty of great white players in college bball (TH, Aaron Grey, Chase Budinger, the twins on Stanford, Drew Neitzel, Devedorf on Syracuse, etc) who are revered by GENERAL collge bball fans because they are great ballplayers (obviously excluding their teams' blood rivals). The only guys from Duke who were really truly universally hated were Christian Laettener and JJ Reddick. I think it is coincidental that they were both white. Its not like people loved Sheldon Williams and hated JJ. |
Bobby Hurley, Chris Collins, Wojo, Greg Newton.
As I said before, being white isn't the only reason why players are hated and it's not a complete reason either. But it seems to me (and many others) to be a factor.
| Matt wrote: |
| You know who I hated?!? Shane Battier! I swear that every time people (announcers, etc.) would talk about him I expected them to say he could walk on water: "Jesus Battier scored 47 points, had 22 boards, 14 assists, 12 steals, and 10 blocks last night for the unprecedented quintuple-double. After the game, he called his mother, went to his volunteer job at the Children's Hospital, and then led a prayer group for inmates at the local jail. Next week he is slated to fly to Europe to pick up his Nobel Prizes. He is expected to stop in Jerusalem to broker Mideast peace on his way back to Durham. Oh, and he helps little old ladies cross the street." |
My wife is a Tar Heel and bigtime Duke hater. She particularly disliked Battier simply because he was so likable. It was like it was unfair to have a guy who was so good and yet also intelligent, funny and humble. That was too much for her to bear. Of course, she doesn't follow the coverage like the rest of us, so she probably didn't realize the extent to which Battier was covered by all the national media.
| WCT wrote: |
| Ok Vick, if you pick UNC's blood rival, then obviously some fans are going to hate Handsborough. But my point is, there are plenty of great white players in college bball (TH, Aaron Grey, Chase Budinger, the twins on Stanford, Drew Neitzel, Devedorf on Syracuse, etc) who are revered by GENERAL collge bball fans because they are great ballplayers (obviously excluding their teams' blood rivals). The only guys from Duke who were really truly universally hated were Christian Laettener and JJ Reddick. I think it is coincidental that they were both white. Its not like people loved Sheldon Williams and hated JJ. |
WCT, I see your point about the rivalry, but come on. Hansbrough is the only player on that list who is even going to finish his career in the same zip code of Laettner and Redick in terms of accomplishment (assuming Budinger doesn't stick around four years). One the ESPN list of "Most Hated Dukies" that came out a while back, I think 8 of 10 were white, 1 was Gerald (who, as Dave said before, wouldn't be on there next year), and 1 was Brian Davis, only there because he was close with Laettner. There's just no way that 8 of 10 is coincidence.
I think that fans also got tired this past year about Duke making excuses that they just didn't have the talent. However, if you look at their roster it is full of McDonald's All Americans. If this is the case that they don't have the talent, I would Coach K is to blame, but no Duke fan would say that.
| acchalfbreed wrote: |
| I can't remember if I had just said a prayer before the hand of "God" was present, but I always looked upon it as a miracle of sorts. Just so you know |
Just once, can't somebody say, "Shane cut me off in traffic" or "That jerk stole my girlfriend" or "He doesn't recycle"? Something? Anything?
| gurufrisbee wrote: |
| graduates most all of it's players from a high academic institution |
It's interesting that you mention that -- that has always been sort of a "there's something rotten in Norway" thing for me. If Duke is so great (tough, rigorous, whatever) academically, then how do so many of the basketball players manage to balance the demands of practice, travel, etc. and still graduate in three years? Is the percentage of all undergraduates who finish in three years more or less than the percentage of basketball players? How about football players? Golf? Tennis? Field hockey? What are these players majoring in? If I walk on to campus day 1 as a regular Joe and say that I can only afford to pay for three years of college, will I be able to finish? How hard/easy will it be? What if I want to major in math? Physics? Engineering?
| Matt wrote: | ||
It's interesting that you mention that -- that has always been sort of a "there's something rotten in Norway" thing for me. If Duke is so great (tough, rigorous, whatever) academically, then how do so many of the basketball players manage to balance the demands of practice, travel, etc. and still graduate in three years? Is the percentage of all undergraduates who finish in three years more or less than the percentage of basketball players? How about football players? Golf? Tennis? Field hockey? What are these players majoring in? If I walk on to campus day 1 as a regular Joe and say that I can only afford to pay for three years of college, will I be able to finish? How hard/easy will it be? What if I want to major in math? Physics? Engineering? |
It wouldn't very hard to graduate in three years if you stay for the summers. Similar to most peer institutions, Duke students are expected to take 4 classes a semester (34 total--there are 2 extra). You play for 3 years, that's 24, so you need 10 more classes--which isn't particularly tough to do in the summers if you would want to stick around anyway. Most students don't, of course, because 1) they love school, 2) they aren't necessarily footing the bill and 3) you can make your resume more impressive with internships and such if you stay the full four years.
Also, your "regular Joe" isn't going to save a lot of money by graduating in three years, since this likely involves some summer work.
As for major, yeah, it'd probably be harder to do a math/physics type major and graduate quickly. There are certainly such players on the team though--Nick Horvath was a physics major, Lee Melchionni was an econ major, etc. Don't think any of the three year players who did that, but it's also not a very big sample size--J-Will, Boozer, Dunleavy, and Shav are the only four I can think of who left after junior year. Not sure how you think this is "so many..."
So, I don't think it's a major issue. It's pretty rare, but I agree that it would be difficult to pull off. Duke is one of the most selective/hardest universities in the country and basketball players are generally not the best of students. They hardly come in with the same academic credentials as regular students and on top of that, they spend a TON of time doing basketball stuff (practice, games, travel, working out, etc). Even with summer school, it seems a bit unlikely to me that they could get a legit degree in only three years. I'm not saying that anyone's cheating, just that they are likely exploiting some loopholes in Duke's requirements/curriculum and are probably not taking a course of study that the university planned.
| Dave wrote: |
| And which of those guys graduated in three years? I know JWill did and I think at least one of Boozer and Dunleavy did. I don't remember hearing that about Shav, since his departure was a surprise.
So, I don't think it's a major issue. It's pretty rare, but I agree that it would be difficult to pull off. Duke is one of the most selective/hardest universities in the country and basketball players are generally not the best of students. They hardly come in with the same academic credentials as regular students and on top of that, they spend a TON of time doing basketball stuff (practice, games, travel, working out, etc). Even with summer school, it seems a bit unlikely to me that they could get a legit degree in only three years. I'm not saying that anyone's cheating, just that they are likely exploiting some loopholes in Duke's requirements/curriculum and are probably not taking a course of study that the university planned. |
I think JWill and Dunleavy did (or were very close and planning to come back after a year in the NBA), although my memory may be faulty. My position's probably like yours, that most players take advantage of the easiest courses they can find. I don't think we're out of line though, and are better than most schools in this respect (check out the football factories sometime for some really creative majors).
Also, per Ted's comment, it's pretty damn easy to get C's in sociology and such. It's very plausible that even with no favoritism at all most if not all basketball players could at least pass.
-Shane Battier's plans for his pro paycheck? To pay off his parents' mortgage. "I'm going to have a pretty similar lifestyle to now," Battier told the Raleigh News & Observer. "The only difference is I'll probably have a nicer home and a nicer TV."
When I get a nice TV and home, I'll try to help my parents buy a better home too.
| vick wrote: |
| It wouldn't very hard to graduate in three years if you stay for the summers. Similar to most peer institutions, Duke students are expected to take 4 classes a semester (34 total--there are 2 extra). |
I am a professor at an ACC school and our students require 120 credits to graduate (my department actually requires 126) -- quite a bit more than the 102 that you quote for Duke (assuming 3 credits per class). I was an undergraduate at another ACC school and it also required 120 credits to graduate. Are you sure about your numbers? If so, I would say that Duke's requirements are very much unlike those of its peer institutions.
I don't know specifically which basketball players have graduated in three years, but I recall it wasn't too long ago that Coach K claimed that no one ever left Duke without graduating while a number of his players left after three years. Who was the first to leave without graduating? It wasn't too long ago, but I don't remember the exact player.
http://www.sportsline.com/collegebasketball/story/7217936
http://www.truthaboutduke.com/outside_lines.php
Matt
| Matt wrote: |
| Whoops, sorry Dave. Didn't mean to cause you any heartache. Given the tone of the most recent "I love Shane" post, the lollerskates and roflcopter seemed appropriate. Have a good holiday weekend.
Matt |
No heartache. I'm not that squeamish, but still, that's probably not what folks are looking for here!
The next day I got a response from someone through the website that was entirely in German. I have no idea if it was him or someone who is paid to respond to fans, and mistakenly thought I was a European fan of his.
What made it so cool is when Shane Battier took the stage, he had a killer electric guitar solo BY HIMSELF playing Johnny B. Goode with the band. Someone beside me told me he had just learned the instrument THAT DAY! I didn’t believe it, but later I heard he had wanted "to do something different". Later, he left the gig with his wife Heidi and took off in a blaze of light in his converted Delorean. Oh, and the party was the best I’ve ever been to. I met my future husband there too! Thanks Shane, where ever you are…
"All children are my children."
Ok, that made me take a second look. This guy, a very tall and generally good lucking, athletic and bald guy, is sitting in the hospital gown with a serious look and friendly intensity. I think he means it, so I ask him back, "Why are all children your children?"
And he says, "I believe it’s my job to be a positive role model because I believe it’s everybody’s job to make our society, our world, a better place.
I was fortunate enough to have positive influences in my life – both my parents and my family – to where I understand its not about how much money you have, its not about the things you have and can buy, its about family, its about community, its about helping others. So I'm a role model for all children. Because we all should be."
Turns out that this guy is a basketball player... a PROFESSIONAL BASKETBALL PLAYER... and is dead serious. As I finish prepping him, I wish him luck in the surgery, and he wishes me luck in being a great mom and then says, "That’s what brings happiness in this life I believe." This guy would be a great parent, I am sure. Where did he come from?
But as I've gotten older and time has moved on, I realize that Shane was just an expression of jealousy for this suffering UNC fan. With age and perspective (and a recent national championship), I can spot Shane a bit of his deserved respect for being as tough as they come AND playing with more pride than some of the floor floppers we see today.
Maybe I'm just glad he's moved on, no longer being an obsticle to our national asperations. But he's still tough. And gracious. Just see what he's doing now for proof.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/sports/5781160.html
BrightCar Car Maintenance Software - Software To Manage Your Car Maintenance Schedule
